|
Remember no one is asking for an end to traffic calming, just TC reform. You be the judge.
From
The San Diego
Union-Tribune
07-Mar-2000 Tuesday
SANTEE -- Her neighbors fought to get speed bumps
installed on Len Street
to slow traffic and protect kids playing in
the street.
Now Lisa Carroll is waging her own battle to have
them removed.
Carroll, who has undergone two back surgeries and
is legally disabled, said
riding over each of the five speed
bumps on the street that leads to her
home on Len Way sends a sharp
pain through her body.
"Riding over these bumps wears me
down. It keeps me from going places I
want to go," she said. "I
can't drive in and out without being in pain."
What's
more, she said, speed bumps aren't safe because they
encourage
children to play in the street. And she worries that they
will slow
emergency vehicles.
Carroll's complaints are
reverberating countywide as residents take issue
with the speed
bumps that have become commonplace on many residential
streets. In El
Cajon, residents are trying to ward off humps before they
are
installed by leading a door-to-door campaign and threatening to sue the
city.
The issue is a divisive one that pits neighbor against
neighbor.
In Santee, Nela Contreras, who also lives on Len
Street, suffers from neck
problems. She said riding over the humps is
painful.
But Contreras hasn't voted on the issue because she
doesn't want to make
anyone mad, particularly her next-door neighbor
and good friend, Carroll
Lunsford, who feels strongly that the humps
should stay. He knows they are
a nuisance, but he also knows they
work.
"I voted to put them in here, and I'll vote until
the day I die to keep
them in here," he said. "For the
people that can't behave themselves, they
need to be in there."
Speed bump proponents find it difficult to
understand why others wouldn't
want the humps. Some categorize
opponents as self-absorbed and
anti-children.
"The
people who oppose the humps just think children should be kept behind
doors," said Nancy Paulis, an El Cajon mother who wants the speed
bumps
installed on Browncroft Way to slow traffic.
But
cities are taking a new philosophy on speed bumps by
requiring that a
community reach consensus about them before they are
installed.
In La Mesa, city officials lifted a speed-bump
ban, which had been in place
for more than a decade, because
residents asked them to. But city officials
brought back speed
bumps only with the understanding that to get them
installed, a
community must agree on the need for them.
Santee officials
recently have amended their speed-bump policy. It now
requires approval from 75 percent of residents of the street in question,
and 75 percent approval from residents who use the street to get to their
homes. Getting the bumps removed requires a 50 percent vote.
The change was made in December after the speed humps
became quite popular.
The city of Santee installed 48 of them last
year at a cost of $1,800
apiece. and this year there is a waiting
list for them.
City Engineer Cary Stewart says speed
bumps are popular because they reduce
speeds on
residential streets from 35 mph to about 25.
Tom Luxner, who
petitioned to have the speed bumps installed on Len
Street
nearly two years ago, said he immediately noticed the
difference the bumps
make.
"You can stand out here
and you'll see the majority of people slow down,"
he said from
his front yard. "I think when you watch traffic slow, that's a
good thing."
But Carroll can't be convinced. She says the
speed bumps only slow drivers
that find them
painful, and she's asking that they be torn up. The city's
traffic
committee rejected her proposal, saying she didn't have signatures
from 50 percent of the affected residents, but she is appealing the
decision to Santee City Council on March 22.
Other Santee
residents are worried about emergency vehicles being delayed.
Fire
Chief Bob Pfohl said the speed bumps force firetrucks to
slow down,
but he said they don't dramatically alter response times
because there are
so few of them. And he said the speed
humps haven't caused any damage to
the firetrucks.
But
Sheila Sarkar, director of the California Institute of Transportation
Safety at San Diego State University, said she is conducting a study in
Encinitas that will show that the speed bumps cause
damage to emergency
response vehicles and that they delay response
times.
"There are much better traffic calming devices that
are more effective,"
said Sarkar, who has designed a
20-foot-wide raised intersection she thinks
works better.
Don Mayo, who lives on Pebble Beach Drive in Santee, considers speed
bumps
unconstitutional because they punish everyone who has to ride
over them.
There are 13 on his road.
He thinks the city
should hire more police officers to enforce speed limits
instead of installing speed bumps.
"I'd
like to see every speed bump in the greater San Diego
area removed,"
Mayo said. "They are an idiot's solution to
a problem because everyone must
suffer because of speeders."