Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:01:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: YOU
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 KETNOM@....... wrote:
MY PRESIDENT MIGHT BE A MORAL DEGENERATE, BUT UNLIKE YOU HE HAS CONTRIBUTED TANGIBLE RESULTS.
Tangible results? Name three.
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 23:22:15 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: YOU
1.) THE ECONOMY IS HEALTHY; MORE THAN IS HAS BEEN FOR 12 YEARS
2.) THE DEFICIT; WHICH A THIRD RATE ACTOR AND HIS MOMMY ADDED 4 TRIL
3.) A BALANCED BUDGET FOR THE FIRST TIME IN A DOGS AGE
4.) EMPLOYMENT IS HIGHER THAN EVER
5.) NO NEWTS OR QUAYLES IN THE BUSHES, IN FACT NO BUSHES TO THROW UP ON OUR
FRIENDS
6.) MILLIONS OF NEW DEMOCRATS
7.) RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS FIGHTING OVER THE SCRAPS OF A RUINED PARTY.
SHALL I GO ON, YOU LOSER??????
Yes, please do. You've managed to come up with One, the same one that
everyone else does, and it isn't even a very good one.
Clinton is in fact given credit for the Reagan economy that he inherited,
but he's done his damnedest to try and ruin it. About the only thing he's
done right is re-appoint Alan Greenspan, so we have to give him a little
credit there.
The Deficit has narrowed tremendously. Thank God that we finally have the
GOP writing up the budget so it can close the gap. Think where we'd be if
some of the more spineless members of the GOP didn't capitulate so easily
to Clinton's big government feel-good-do-little spending plans.
The Budget isn't balanced yet. Social Security is still covering it. Take
a look at the numbers - the debt rose last year. And Clinton had to be
dragged kicking and screaming into balancing the budget, but it was
brought this close by the economy and by getting the Deficit down (and
let's face -- killing the deficit means balancing the budget).
So so far, your first three items are part of one thing, and part of your
statement isn't even true. And this is granting you that Clinton had
something to do with it.
Unemployment is, in fact, down to "everyone employed", with is less than 5
per cent unemployment, which is a great thing to have with the economy
going so .... Oops, there's that economy thing again. So you're still
at one.
The other stuff is pure bull backed up from the septic tank of your brain.
You still owe me two.
I knew you couldn't do it. Because it can't be done.
CJB
I'm not the only one who thinks the line-up from your side stinks. The
following is from Maureen Dowd. You asked if wanted more; I have news for you,
you picked the wrong guy..... you scream "uncle" when you've had enough
CAPMAN
Maureen Dowd is hardly a balanced voice of reason in the storm.
Two big mistakes in this column.
First, it's all personal attacks and her opinion of what she believes they
would look like or do in the Oval Office as told to her by her own
prejudices. Second, it assumes that Clinton's unconstitutional declaration
of war will still be in effect two years from now.
Frankly, I'd rather have a Republican, any Republican, in charge of
foreign policy rather than the disaster we have now. When
Bush (who knew how to run a war) left the office to Clinton, I had hoped
for four years of peace. Bush even handed Clinton a gift -- a peaceful
mission to Somalia. All Bill had to do was bring the boys home. Instead,
he changed their mission, left them there and men were killed and dragged
through the streets.
So far his greatest military victory has been storming Waco.
My prayers go to the members of our armed forces.
CJB
Look, "s[expletive deleted]
for brains", you wouldn't admit the truth if it bit you in the
ass.
In a message dated 99-04-01 07:28:42 EST, you write:
But not your support, you lying scumbag. See "YOU" for the rest of my answer.
Unlike Bill Clinton and Somalia, you will never see me advocating
withholding needed supplies and equipment from our men in the field.
I don't believe that they should have gone over there in the first place,
and I think we should try to avoid sending more in. I don't believe in
withholding funding for food, equipment, fuel, clothing or bullets. That
was the job of the Jane Fondas fighting against Viet Nam. Nor will you see
me go to England and protest my country on foreign soil, nor spit on the
troops when they return.
You have no clue what you're talking about, so why don't you tell me
something you know, like the taste of shoe leather.
When it comes to having a clue, you ignorant misguided
a[expletive deleted]e,
I doubt you
could find your own ass with both hands. As for the taste in your mouth, does
Trents semen taste any better than Ronnies or Newts or that old penguin who
ran the lynch mob in the House?
Rereading my messages and yours, I'd have to confer the title of
"lobotomized zombie" onto you I'm afraid.
Better that than the image of a knee-jerk puppet in the sub-species of the
animal world. As for a personal title you hold, "Outstanding Jerkoff in the
Conservative Republican Masterbation Society"
Don't you have any real work to do???? Then again sucking up the slime of
your idols dosen't require much time, I guess???
Hmmm, now let's see. Who is it in the Beltway that is known for receiving
fellatio? What was his name again?
Oh, so you blew Bill too??? How did he taste?
[Ed note: It's just matter of fact with him that his own
hero would engage in this particular activity. Very telling.]
You know, I can practically see the veins popping out of your neck.
You're starting to blither, my friend.
Hurl the insults as you will. Insults are all you have.
Apparently you're one of the welfare babies that sit around
waiting for handouts, giving you ample time to pick your nose
and flick it my way. Or were those pieces of your brain that
have withered away from lack of use.
CJB
Don't call me your friend; to an ignorant (your spelling proves that-- or is
is this one of the lackeys who
s[expletive deleted
your d[expletive deleted),
[Ed note: I'll admit that I corrected several of my own typos
when creating this page. I did NOT add any of Ketnom's. Compare for
yourself. Also note who went with the spelling argument when they had
nothing else....]
a[expletive deleted]e
( your politics),
like you, I'm your worst nightmare. I'm rich ( thanks to Clintons prosperity),
I'm smart ( 162 IQ- member of Mensa), I'm Italian and from Brooklyn ( the less
said the better). So why don't you and the sick bunch at the other end of this
email are beginning to bore me. Believe me, you don't want to really bore me.
I do not get mad.... I get even. Over and over. You have my permission to go
on being a legend in your own mind
Amazing that you can claim to be so smart and yet you write so dumb.
Your arguments are empty strings of insults with nothing behind them.
You don't even try. You just invite me to s[expletive
deleted] d[expletive deleted]. You have
nothing.
A pity. A mind is such a terrible thing to waste.
And what a waste it is to lose one's mind or to never have had a mind
at all. Now I know who Dan was referring to.
CJB
I write dumb in your eyes because you are blind. Blind to the facts
that you and your kind can't understand why we (75% of the American
public) don't care about you asinine politics. We reject your constant
squabbling over the crumbs of power you once had. The right wing
Rebublicans had 12 years; outside of restoring our pride, Ronnie boy and
his mommy sold us into debt my great-grandchildren will be paying off.
And for what end... to hasten an already crumbling Red Empire. He sold
arms to our enemies and lied about it. In Iceland, the dumb
s[expletive deletedch
nearly gave away the store because he spoke on his own.
Now enter georgie "read my lips". Not too bad by himself, but he
brings along fly-weight baggage Quayle. Millions of people pray for
Bush not to die. Little Danny almost tops Clinton in his ability to
avoid Vietnam.
[Ed note: No, it didn't get by me that Ketnom concedes
that the impeached president is a draft dodger -- although he tries
to equate him to Dan Quayle who did serve in some capacity in
the military during the war.]
Takes on a television character like it's a real person.
[Ed note: No, it didn't get by me that Ketnom is clueless
about the text of the actual speech Dan gave.]
He also says, and does, so many stupid things, the comics have material
for years. The public has enough and Bush-y boy becomes on of the few
one term presidents. He, too, commits impeachable deeds... but what the
fuck we got him out of office.
This chain of events so angers the losing side (you), not only do they start
a campaign of slander against the winner (My Boy Bill), but they conspire to
toss him out of office. Clinton (an admittidly easy target) won't go down no
matter what. Every time they get close... he slips away. Furious. they let
the conspiracy take wing. ken starr linda trip, you, monica, et al, crank up
the entrapment and let it fly. BUT, what happens...THE PUBLIC DOES NOT
CARE!!!! All the public knows is that nothing is getting done; 50 mil down
the drain and they are properous.
The Senate throws out the charges (A DIRECT SLAP in the face to the House)
and the guilty party laughs himself blue in the face.
Also I do not invite you to
s[expletive deleted
d[expletive deleted,
I SAID YOU DO
S[expletive deleted
D[expletive deleted!! You and
all the faggots on your staff have bored me silly. You are too stupid to see
the truth, and when you are all thrown out on you dead asses you still won't
see it. So this is my last effort to straighten you out (a dead issue) I
don't want to play any more
F[expletive deleted] YOU ALL AND GOOD BYE!!!!
And so ends the saga of Ketnom the A[expletive deleted]e.
To be fair to his inferiority, I've allowed him to have the last word.
I didn't want to be accused of taking any final potshots without giving
him the chance to respond. At least in his final missive before signing
off, he finally took the opportunity to actually say something.
Though I was curious about his use of the words "faggot" and
"straighten you out", I let it go ... although he does come across
as fixated on the topic.
Don't laugh. Pity him.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 06:22:50 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: YOU
So long
"loser"
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 01:03:40 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: THE WAR
"It could be even more scary.
We could have Elizabeth Dole in the Oval Office running the war.
It's hard to imagine the woman who likes to coordinate the color of her shoes
with the color of the rug on the stage where she gives a speech dealing with
any crisis that involves a lot of variables, a lot of unpredictable turns that
she could not control. I cringe at the thought of Dan Quayle as Commander in
Chief, too. You picture him wearing one of those propeller beanies and
annoying generals by playing with the colored pins on the military maps.
George W. Bush, who's getting coached on foreign affairs by his dad's old wise
men, did not exude confidence when he took two days to come out with a
position on Kosovo so vague that The Wall Street Journal dubbed it
"Clintonian.""
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 06:28:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: THE WAR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:17:13 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: YOU
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 09:21:10 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: THE WAR
My prayers go to the members of our armed forces.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 08:53:45 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: THE WAR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:33:24 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: THE WAR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 08:54:53 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: YOU
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:47:30 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: YOU
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:24:20 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: THE WAR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 16:47:49 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: THE WAR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:27:50 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: YOU
The facts and the truth remain on my side.
Feel free to respond with more insults.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 17:05:05 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: YOU
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 21:13:01 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher J. Burke
To: KETNOM@.......
Subject: Re: YOU
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 00:01:45 EST
From: KETNOM@.......
To: cjburke@io.com
Subject: Re: YOU
A man with a double digit IQ should not try this. Nothing makes me
happier than to know Ronnie now sits in a corner drooling on himself
with no memory of ever being president... a most fitting end to the most
imcompetent man to ever hold the office.
Afterword
Letters mailed to the editor are subject to publication and become
property of the editor. Surface mail cannot be returned.
Thank you. Have a nice day.