- What is Marfan Syndrome? -- a big pain
in the ass.
Okay, aside from that . . .
- How did you learn that you had it?
- What if I think I (or a child I know)
have it?
- What have you done about it?
- So has this really affected your life?
- Might genetic testing make Marfan
Syndrome a thing of the past?
- Is Marfan Syndrome in the news at all?
- What are the latest advances in treating
Marfan Syndrome?
- Women and Marfan -- body image issues
- Where to learn more -- web sites and
mailing lists
So has it really changed your life?
Aside from never being able to find a goddamned store-bought shirt with
long enough sleeves, not yet -- although I am finding it annoying to realize
that not only shouldn't I study things like rock-climbing or aikido, but I
can't. I've never been an athlete, but there is a difference between
choosing that you don't have the time or inclination to do something, and
being told that you can't. At times, watching athletes or actors
doing particularly vigorous things can bother me since, for example, my
decision not to study aikido is no longer my free choice, but has been made
for me, and I truly do wish very much that I could do many of those things.
That can be very difficult to adjust to, and I am still learning.
That's part of the psychological adjustment that comes with a chronic
disability, I suppose, and having most people assume that I can't because
I'm a "girl" doesn't help.
But my behavior has not altered measurably.
Marfan Syndrome often comes in degrees. (There are many, many
documented mutations of Chromosome 15 that lead to Marfan Syndrome, and
the effects each bring about are not of identical severity.)
There are people who are affected
by it who have had multiple heart and eye surgeries by the time they are 15,
and there are people like me, who know only that we tend to be tall and
thin, have bad knees and a bad back, and have a fast heart rate. For
some people with Marfan Syndrome, their lives are dictated by it from a
very young age. But for
others, it means exercising more moderately and taking
beta blockers once a day until age reduces the flexibility of
the heart valves or the aorta, upon which point surgery is performed.
Marfan may leave a young child legally blind and requiring
orthopedic braces to walk, or it may only be found in a 50 year old adult
in a routine physical, who never suspected a problem before. It's very
individual -- many people who read this site have worse problems, some
don't have as many. My own history can't be taken as too much of an indicator
of what yours or your child's could be -- but be that as it may, don't
panic. Things are definitely improving for people affected by Marfan Syndrome.
So since I am one of the mild cases, I don't consider that my life has been
altered in a big way by it.
I've always eaten a heart-smart diet just out of
preference (trans.: I've never liked salt or red meat at all before, so I
don't miss them now), and it was actually nice to know that there is one root
cause to all the annoying orthopedic problems that I've always had to put
up with. Instead of having bad knees, a bad back, a clicking jaw, and a
racing heart, it's only one problem -- Marfan.
As I age, no
doubt more problems will make themselves evident. And I must admit, many
with Marfan Syndrome are not as fortunate as I.
So wow, you're disabled?
Not in a traditional movie-of-the-week sense, no, I'm not. I have to take
beta blockers, and moderate my physical activity, but that's about it. If
you were to see me on the street, you would say nothing other than, "My,
she's rather tall," and perhaps note that I'm a bit gangly and sharp-faced.
Prior to my getting high-index plastic lenses in my glasses, you would also
have noticed some way thick Coke bottle glasses on my nose.
There are people who have Marfan Syndrome who are much worse off -- people
who have had dissections at age 15, who have a distinctly concave sternum
(breastbone) and hence a very hollow chest, or who have had multiple heart,
orthopedic, or eye
surgeries. I am not one of them -- again, Marfan is a disorder that comes
in varying degrees. I don't want people thinking that having a lousy copy
of Chromosome 15 or having a *S*Y*N*D*R*O*M*E* with a name means more than
it does. Anyone with a disability, no matter how severe, is not
someone who is a walking medical issue, they are not a movie-of-the-week
heroine or hero, and in almost all cases, their disability is not the most
significant thing about them. I'm not "suffering from" Marfan, I'm not
"afflicted" with Marfan, I'm not "crippled" by Marfan, I'm not a "victim"
of Marfan, or any other telethon poster-child terms like that. I'm
affected by Marfan.
If you asked me what mattered about myself, I'd tell you that I am a bit
of a hothead (well okay, more than a bit), technically adept,
artistic, love to take things apart, love
teaching and explaining things to people, am crazy about
handcrafts, love
my cats, am a compulsive reader, have an
independent streak a mile wide, am ambitious, and like to save money. I'd
run through a long, long list of qualities that I possess before I ever
thought to say that I also have Marfan Syndrome.
That's not to say that Marfan hasn't had an impact on my life, though.
Pinched nerves, back pain, headaches, heart palps,
and medication will have an effect
on your life and your outlook from time to time -- particularly chronic
pain, which is a little world all its own. It's important to realize that
dealing with chronic pain can be very draining. If a person needs to
decompress or feels down, that doesn't mean they aren't strong. If a person
looks okay and is coping, it doesn't mean they aren't in pain. Frequently,
able-bodied people have a problem understanding this -- "Don't let it get
to you," isn't reasonable when you live with it every second of every day of
your life. Sometimes, you do have to let your hair down and let
yourself get angry or down about it. Then, you get it behind you, and move
on. "Don't let it get to you," means, "Don't let it keep you from living an
accomplished and ambitious life," not, "Don't ever reveal the slightest trace
of pain, sadness, or annoyance for even one second."
Are other things like depression or learning disabilities associated with Marfan Syndrome?
As happens with almost every genetic disorder, people are generally curious
about whether or not learning or emotional impairment comes along for
the ride with Marfan Syndrome. We understand more about how our genes
impact the development of our bodies, but we're still in the dark about
how they impact the development of our personalities and intellects, so
we're curious.
We're also prone to jump to conclusions, and perhaps believe things before
they've actually been demonstrated. "In the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we can believe that people with genetic disorders are also
learning- or emotionally-disabled as well." While our genes probably
do have a significant impact on our minds and emotional well-being, it's
premature to assume that this is the case with something as well-pinpointed
as Marfan Syndrome. Before such a conclusion can be treated as true, it
needs to be medically proven. And, whether for good or ill, there has
been no illustrated link between any sort of learning or emotional
disability and Marfan Syndrome.
It's also important to realize that, while people with a genetic disability
have proof that at least one gene has affected them, every single human
being alive or dead has also been affected by their genes, and who knows how
their personalities were shaped by them. People with Marfan have genes
that have had definitive effects on us, but so has everyone else. To look
at it another way -- yes, my C15 might have affected my personality. But who
knows how the gene for blue eyes might affect someone? How about the gene
for freckles? If one gene can be assumed to be connected to bad qualities,
what's to say others aren't as well? Maybe people with shoulder length
curly hair who bite their nails a lot are predisposed to axe murder.
And when it comes to genes that hurt society,
I can guarantee you that I'd be much more interested in wiping out whatever
genetic abnormality makes some people play their goddamned music at hurricane
volumes at 10:30pm on a Sunday night, even if those particular genes don't
have any other salient effects on their bodies. Forget about the Marfan gene;
what about eradicating:
- the Passive-Aggressive Weasel gene?
- The Wife Beater gene?
- The Treats Minorities Like Garbage gene?
- The Lies Like A Cheap Toupee gene?
- The Drinks Too Much gene?
- The Petty Dictator gene?
I can guarantee you
they impair human society a lot more than the Marfan gene.
Although no demonstrable link between learning or emotional disabilities
and Marfan Syndrome has been shown to exist,
what has been demonstrated is that, for children who have Marfan, sitting in
uncomfortable school desks that are not suited to our physical problems
can result in fidgeting and inattention -- which can seem like
Attention Deficit Disorder. For patients who have to struggle against
their insurance companies to avoid being thrown into debt for the rest of
their lives (I know one woman who is in debt for $90,000), depression is
a normal outcome -- just as it would be for anyone who is going through a
divorce or bankruptcy, which are not medical conditions.
Marfan for the most part is structural, and while many things still need
to be learned about it, it's important to wait until evidence has shown a
link between it and anything else. And the same could be said of anything
in life: Assume too much, and you make an ASS out of U and ME. The reasons
why people might link other problems with Marfan are easy to understand,
though.
For most people, who do not understand the cause of Marfan Syndrome, they
may be prepared to believe anything about it. They may jump to conclusions
about the nature of the disorder, or believe that it is caused by something
that is unrelated to it. I once had the unpleasant experience of watching
this very process at work once while I was watching C-SPAN (yes, I'm a
C-SPAN geek, I confess). They were airing a discussion panel by a bunch
of psychiatrists on disability and the American presidency: what constitutes
a disability that can interfere with job performance, who was disabled,
who hid it and who was open about it . . . that sort of thing. I was
interested because of the association of Abraham Lincoln with Marfan
Syndrome, so I settled down to watch.
The only time that Lincoln was mentioned was when a bunch of psychiatrists
-- people with Ph. D.'s and medical degrees, mind you! -- leaped madly to
the wrong conclusion that Marfan, since it results in excessive
height, was a hormonal imbalance and hence "probably" resulted in emotional
problems as well. Completely wrong -- and not one of these medical doctors
thought to stop themselves en route to the wrong conclusions and say, "You
know, does anyone in this room actually know what causes Marfan Syndrome?"
Their scant knowledge -- association of height with growth hormones, and
how pregnant women get weepy because of hormones -- resulted in them
running pell-mell into left field. And they didn't even know it. That
entire roomful of people, and everyone else who was watching that show,
was left with the (erroneous) impression that people with Marfan could be
dangerously emotionally unstable.
People with Marfan can also jump to conclusions, and for more concrete
reasons. When you have a disorder that impacts so many apparently unrelated
body systems, it's tempting to see everything that goes wrong with you as
a symptom of Marfan. In reality, just because someone has Marfan doesn't
mean they won't have anything else in their lives. People with Marfan get
cancer like everyone else -- not because of their Marfan, but because they
can indeed get cancer, just like everyone else. People with Marfan get
migraines, allergies, and the entire complex of other things that any other
able-bodied person gets. And when your entire medical history so far has
been dictated by your Marfan, it's very easy to assume that your food
allergies or your dyslexia is also related to it.
They may be -- but it's vitally important to refrain from leaping to any
sort of conclusion without hard evidence. And so far no evidence has
uncovered a link between Marfan Syndrome and any of a variety of learning
or emotional disorders. Stay current on the latest research through the
National Marfan Foundation.
"Genetic testing might make Marfan Syndrome a thing of the past.
Wouldn't that be great?"
Believe it or not, this is more of a grey area than most able-bodied
people think, as is the case with most genetic conditions such as
albinism, achondroplasia (dwarfism), or anything that results in an
unusual appearance or body structure. I believe I can narrow the
concerns down to two different considerations.
The first concern is that people who wish to alter another person's body
structure might wish to do so not for the comfort of the affected person,
but for their own comfort -- perhaps because seeing someone with an unusual
anatomy is something they find alarming or disquieting. Instead
of the affected person's comfort and convenience, they are thinking of
their own. They consider that the affected person offends their
sensibilities, and must be altered so that they are not disquieted --
even subconsciously.
This
isn't a big reason for all such considerations, and especially given that
Marfan Syndrome kills, a strong case can be made that it should be
eliminated. (When it comes to other conditions that are simply unusual
and sometimes inconvenient but not often lifethreatening, like achondroplasia,
this argument can't really be made.)
But at any rate, the concern still stands -- do you wish to alter someone or
remove their condition from the human race because you care for their comfort
or survival, or because they make you nervous or queasy? Are you thinking
of their comfort or your own? These are not trivial questions. If they
seem reasonable to you, then would it also be reasonable to encourage black
people to lighten their skin, or Asians to have plastic surgery to look
occidental in order to make others comfortable? There is a line that has
to be drawn here, and we can't ignore it.
Another consideration sounds sentimentalist, but it's not. (I've got a
heart like a cash register, so I don't think I can fairly be accused
of being a sentimentalist.) When I consider what I learned about life
and various issues, both political and psychological, from having Marfan
Syndrome, I'm not entirely sure I'd want to do without those insights.
Of course, when I think of my dad or my brother, I'd rid them of their
Marfan in a heartbeat if I could, so it's still a grey area. But this
is a valid point to bring up: many people with genetic conditions or
disabilities are proud of the hard-won insights into life that their
conditions have given them. Several of our most effective presidents had
serious physical ailments or outright disabilities.
If we rid humanity of these genetic conditions,
might we also rid ourselves of what they could teach us?
I don't mean to state that NO genetic conditions should be eradicated,
or even that one person might not feel differently about their own
situation depending on the day of the week, their mood, or whether
they've had their morning coffee yet. I lost my father to this damned
disability, and that loss continues to be far and away the worst
experience of my life. But I've also
learned a lot from my own Marfan. It's just not as simple an issue
as the able-bodied community often believes. There are grey
areas here, and they must be taken into account when the topic comes
up.
Marfan Syndrome in the news
There has been a wonderful increase in the awareness of Marfan Syndrome
recently due to a number of things -- mostly due to the efforts of the
NMF, but partly due to some questions
being raised about various people both famous and infamous, as well as
various media health issues.
- July 2000:
-
Doctors around the country feel confident enough in DNA testing that
they are poised to begin genetic tests on samples of Abraham Lincoln's
DNA, harvested from the blood, hair, and bones of the late president.
You can see the article at
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20000725lincoln8.asp.
- January 2000:
-
Recent research has demonstrated that a number of St. Jude mechanical heart
valves, those with a silver coating on the valve cuff (called Silzone) are
prone to leakage around the valve cuff. People with Marfan are highly
likely to have mechanical heart valves, and if you have had a St. Jude
valve implant, you should learn about it to see if you have reason for
concern. You can learn more at
http://www.sjm.com/3.0/3.6/3.6.3.shtm. You can find phone
numbers for more information, affected model numbers, and more.
- August 1999:
-
In January of 1996, the playwright Jonathon Larson, writer of the Tony award
winning Broadway show "Rent," died of a misdiagnosed aortic dissection. He
went into an ER while he was suffering the symptoms of a dissection and was
diagnosed as having stomach flu, handed antibiotics, and sent home. He
went back the second day and was sent home again. Within 24hrs, he was
found dead in his apartment, and he's not the first such case of someone
being sent home to die of an aortic dissection. Thanks to this web page, I
can tell you that I've gotten several messages from people who can relate
identical stories about their friends, spouses, and children being sent home,
oftentime after they tried to check themselves into the hospital. One such
woman died on the way home from the ER in her friend's car.
The reason why I'm bringing this up now is because Larson's parents have
recently won a million-dollar chunk of money from the hospitals
that misdiagnosed
their son, Cabrini Medical Center and St. Vincent's Medical Center. Both
hospitals were also issued Statements of Deficiency and fined by the
New York Health Department. If you have lost a friend or family member
due to a Marfan misdiagnosis and are presently trying to find a lawyer to
take your case, definitely mention this -- it sets a precedent for such
cases being won. Be sure to print out
the NMF press release for
any lawyer you talk to, and good luck.
What are the latest advances in treatment?
It's important to realize that it wasn't too long ago that doctors didn't
even know what Marfan Syndrome was. It was believed to be a muscle
weakness, asthma, even poor posture. The malformation of connective
tissue (specifically, a component called fibrillin) was only discovered in
1986 by Dr. Lynn Sakai. The genetic cause was only traced to chromosome 15,
FBN1 in 1992. To think of it another way, Bill Clinton was president
when the root cause of Marfan Syndrome was found -- that's incredibly recent.
As a result, this new level of understanding has promoted a tremendous
increase in the quality of care for Marfan Syndrome patients. Whereas the
expected lifespan for men and women was 40 and 50, respectively, in the mid
1970s, nowdays it's up to 70. The new knowledge that we have, and have gained
only recently, has made an amazing difference in relatively little time.
Nowdays, beta blockers are prescribed routinely for everyone affected by
Marfan Syndrome (if your doctor doesn't give you beta blockers the second
the diagnosis is made, get another doctor). If Marfan is diagnosed while
you are relatively young, this can prevent the need for cardiac surgery
entirely. If, like me, you are older when you are diagnosed (I was
33 at time of diagnosis), taking beta blockers can push the need for surgery
into the future far enough to make a real difference.
This doesn't sound like much more than avoidance until you look at the
advances being made in surgical techniques. Even ten years ago, the only
option for patients with dilating aortas or bad heart valves was surgical
removal and replacement with artificial aortic arches and artificial heart
valves. In order to prevent blood clots from forming on the implants,
breaking off, and wandering off to cause strokes and blockages elsewhere in
the body, people with these implants must take anticoagulants daily for the
rest of their lives.
Nowdays, doctors are working on ways to wrap the aorta in
something akin to an Ace bandage to shore it up so that it doesn't dilate
and need replacement in the first place.
Surgical techniques are being pioneered not to remove and replace faulty
heart valves with mechanical ones
-- but to actually fix the ones you've got. Both of these options
avoid the need for anticoagulant medications since the only surfaces that
your blood would contact are the natural surfaces of your own heart and
blood vessels.
Scoliosis treatment is advancing as well, although it is less well understood.
A spine is, after all, a rather big thing. But if a Marfan diagnosis is made
before adolescence, then a brace can be applied to prevent the advancement
of the curve during the growth spurt. And eye surgery techniques to deal
with off-center lenses and cataracts are improving daily.
If you have just been diagnosed with Marfan Syndrome, and you are not in
immediate need of surgical intervention, the best thing in the world for
you to do is take your beta blockers religiously, moderate your activity
level, and monitor your aortic diameter. If you can forestall the need
for surgery for even ten years, the advances will likely be such that you
might not receive any implants whatsoever. Again, the understanding of just
what Marfan is has increased the quality of care and treatment astronomically
in just the last ten years, and that curve doesn't appear to be levelling off
any time soon.
Women and Marfan -- body issues
One of the more irritating nonmedical things that I've found out about
having Marfan Syndrome is that it is very difficult to talk about this
disorder as a woman, when two of the symptoms of the disorder are height and
thinness. Mild Marfan Syndrome can sometimes be seen as not a disorder at
all by many laypeople, particularly women who battle their weight.
This can be particularly annoying for women who have Marfan Syndrome
who get the distinct impression that even though we may sustain cardiac
problems, we are not nearly as bad off as someone who can't find a pair
of jeans that fit or who joined Jenny Craig last week. Otherwise, we are
often pitied smugly by the same women who take a very poorly-disguised
pleasure in the fact that, while we may be thin and tall, we are in
actuality disabled. It feeds a sort of spiteful revenge for them to feel
justified in thinking, "See! I always knew that all those thin
women on TV and in the movies that I see are actually death-warmed-over!"
Failing this, they can be
tolerant and "forgiving," seeing the syndrome as a suitable "apology" for
being thin. These same women would never dare to express any smugness or
hostility toward an attractive blind woman, or a thin woman in a wheelchair.
And yet Marfan Syndrome and its attendant height and thinness are seen as
fair targets.
It's especially tragic because many overweight women who react this way
often complain about the unfair and distorted body image in our society
that demands that a woman be unrealistically and unheathily thin -- and yet
in their reaction to women with Marfan Syndrome, they reveal that they
have bought into that mindset hook, line, and sinker.
If you are reading this and have ever felt this way, please be aware that
we are not thin to piss you off, to make you feel bad about yourself, and
that we are not about to apologize for what we look like. Nor are we
tragically and justly deformed. This is what our bodies are, no more and
no less. It's that simple. Many people who are affected by Marfan
Syndrome have also lived a life of childhood taunts and cruelty, which hurt
just as much as any joke about the Pillsbury Doughboy. We will not
apologize for being what we are.
My way of looking at it is that this syndrome has cost me enough. It took
my father from me before I was 21. And because of it, my body has caused me
enough problems, and I've gotten few enough pleasures and more than enough
pain out of it. If I can get one measley positive experience out of it by
wearing a short skirt or a spandex dress or two, I've more than got it
coming.
Is pregnancy a particular problem?
It can be. Most OB/GYNs will consider any pregnancy on the part of a woman
with Marfan Syndrome a "high risk" pregnancy. Gestating a baby and delivering
it is a very stressful thing for a body to do, and the process can place a
tremendous amount of stress on an already sub-par cardiovascular symptom.
Instances of women dying from aortic dissections during gestation or delivery
are not unheard of. The National Marfan
Foundation's literature states that a woman with Marfan Syndrome whose
aorta has dilated by 10% stands an extremely high chance of suffering a
dissection or rupture during gestation or delivery. THIS CAN KILL
YOU AND CAN KILL YOUR FETUS AS WELL. Even if you don't experience
a dissection or aneurysm during pregnancy, your chances of having one
soon after the child is born increase
dramatically due to the greater stress of gestation on your cardiovascular
system. Even if you give birth successfully, you may not live to see your
child out of diapers.
Because of this, the best option for a woman with Marfan Syndrome is simply
not to give birth.
If you wish to do so anyway, you must consult with a
cardiologist specializing in Marfan Syndrome during your pregnancy. It is
recommended that you finish having children by at least age 30 in order to
place the maximum stress on your cardiovascular system when it is in as
good shape as it's going to be, and any woman with an aortic diameter over
4cm is strongly discouraged from getting pregnant.
Adoption is absolutely the best
option for the health of a woman with Marfan Syndrome.
If you're currently pregnant and you have Marfan, you must have many
echocardiograms done to monitor the size of your aorta. Doing one at
the beginning isn't enough. Pregnancy stresses the cardiovascular system
tremendously, and if your aorta is at 3.2cm at the beginning of your
pregnancy, and suddenly begins to expand over the next few months,
there is a strong possibiliy that you will die before delivering. If you
have Marfan and are currently pregnant, a cardiologist familiar with
Marfan absolutely, positively must be intimately involved with your
situation. Multiple and nearly constant monitoring of your aorta is
crucial to your and your fetus's survival.
Aside from the issues surrounding pregnancy and parturition, there are also
the issues surrounding the
passing on of the defective Chromosome 15 by
either parent -- mother or father. These issue must be weighed
carefully by anyone, male or female, who has Marfan Syndrome and is considering
having children. If you have Marfan Syndrome, any of your children stand
a 50% chance of having it as well.
How can I learn more?
The following links are excellent places to start finding out more about
Marfan Syndrome. However, please be aware that all the webpages in the
world won't tell you nearly as much about your condition or that of a
friend or family member as much as one good echocardiogram will. If you
suspect that you or someone you know is affected by Marfan Syndrome, you
must see a doctor in order to be evaluated. I recommend a cardiologist
who is familiar with Marfan Syndrome.
You can also turn up good stuff at any of the various search engines by
entering "Marfan Syndrome."
|