<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>iTwitch</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/" />
<modified>2006-01-20T23:10:08Z</modified>
<tagline>mostly visual notes on design, politics and other stuff</tagline>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2008:/~dme/blog//1</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.11">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2006, dme</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Announcing the Erwin House Blog</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2006/01/announcing_the.html" />
<modified>2006-01-20T23:10:08Z</modified>
<issued>2006-01-20T22:59:52Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2006:/~dme/blog//1.68</id>
<created>2006-01-20T22:59:52Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">We&apos;re building a house on top of our house. And now, we&apos;re blogging it. Erwin House Dream meets reality. See how it turns out!...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>We're building a house on top of our house. And now, we're blogging it. </p>

<p><a href="http://thismetalife.com/erwinhouse/">Erwin House</a></p>

<p>Dream meets reality. See how it turns out!</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>File Under: Duh!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/09/file_under_duh.html" />
<modified>2005-09-23T20:15:53Z</modified>
<issued>2005-09-23T20:12:38Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.67</id>
<created>2005-09-23T20:12:38Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Pattern of Errors Emboldened Terrorists, Bush Says The headline, at least. Wonder if it was on purpose....</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-092205bush_lat,0,1100596.story?coll=la-story-footer&track=morenews">Pattern of Errors Emboldened Terrorists, Bush Says</a></p>

<p>The headline, at least. Wonder if it was on purpose.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Oh, John.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/05/oh_john.html" />
<modified>2005-05-20T21:41:21Z</modified>
<issued>2005-05-20T21:32:22Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.66</id>
<created>2005-05-20T21:32:22Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I remember about 2 years ago, as the Democratic Presidential Primaries were getting started, Howard Dean was on topic all the time, talking about things I cared about and John Kerry was, well, kinda in his own world. I would...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I remember about 2 years ago, as the Democratic Presidential Primaries were getting started, Howard Dean was on topic all the time, talking about things I cared about and John Kerry was, well, kinda in his own world. I would get emails from Dean saying "It's time to get the UN involved in Iraq, before we are perceived as an occupying power" and Kerry would have an email saying  “Save the Pell Grant!”</p>

<p>I’m still subscribed to all those lists and today I got a flashback from those days. </p>

<p>From MoveOn.org: Subject “David. This is it.” So topical they don’t even have to say it’s referring to the fight to preserve Senate rules.<br />
 <br />
And From JohnKerry.org: Subject “Fun New Merchandise for Democrats!”</p>

<p>John, John, John.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>&quot;the&quot;, &quot;a&quot; and the difference between symbols and things.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/05/the_a_and_the_d_1.html" />
<modified>2005-05-20T21:30:00Z</modified>
<issued>2005-05-16T18:26:42Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.65</id>
<created>2005-05-16T18:26:42Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I&apos;ve been hearing this on the radio for a few days and, outside of all the huge issues involved, there is one curious small one. “Newsweek magazine Sunday apologized for a May 9 report alleging U.S. interrogators flushed the Quran...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I've been hearing this on the radio for a few days and, outside of all the huge issues involved, there is one curious small one.</p>

<p>“<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156591,00.html">Newsweek magazine Sunday apologized for a May 9 report alleging U.S. interrogators flushed the Quran down the toilet at Guantanamo Bay...</a>”</p>

<p>Isn't there a big difference between <strong>the</strong> Quran and <strong>a copy of the</strong> Quran, and <strong>the</strong> toilet and <strong>a</strong> toilet?</p>

<p>If you use “the”, then the sentence is symbolic. </p>

<p>“George Bush flushed the constitution down the toilet.”</p>

<p>If you use “a” then the sentence is factual, and the act is possibly symbolic.</p>

<p>“George Bush flushed a copy of the constitution down a toilet.” </p>

<p>Or possibly he just brought it into the men’s room for a little light reading and it slipped out of his hands.</p>

<p>Anyway, there is a difference between “the toilet” and “a toilet” just like there is a difference between “the moon” and “a moon” with one small exception. “The moon” is a specific moon and “the toilet” is not any toilet, but a metaphor for disrespectful disposal.</p>

<p>So what does it mean that the media is mixing these up? I think it’s more than just sloppy, but I’m not sure what it is.</p>

<p><strong>Update:</strong> I had a chance to check my copy of Newsweek for the actual original wording. " ... interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed <strong>a</strong> Qur'an down <strong>a</strong> toilet and led a detainee around with a collar and dog leash." It gets worse after that.</p>

<p>And Newsweek is still hosting the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7693014/site/newsweek/">story</a>, unedited. Imagine that. </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How to make my day.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/04/how_to_make_my_1.html" />
<modified>2005-04-20T15:11:32Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-20T15:02:15Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.63</id>
<created>2005-04-20T15:02:15Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I haven&apos;t been posting here very often. If you&apos;re wondering where I&apos;ve been, I&apos;ve been on Flickr. My recent obsession with photography has been rewarding and fun, but yesterday was a new high. Hi David, Just wanted to say that...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I haven't been posting here very often. If you're wondering where I've been, I've been on <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/daviderwin/">Flickr</a>. My recent obsession with photography has been rewarding and fun, but yesterday was a new high. </p>

<blockquote>Hi David, <br><br>
 
Just wanted to say that I'm a fan of your photos. I'm an
asst editor at Popular Photography magazine, and trying to
get together some images and comments about Flickr for a
short write-up about the site.  <br><br>
 
Was wondering if you'd like to provide some thoughts about
why you use Flickr, what you like about it, and what your
photography background is. Also, I'd like to publish one of
your really saturated, colorful photos and pay you ---- for
one-time use. </blockquote>

<p>How cool is that?</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>We like him. He is a good guy. </title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/03/we_like_him_he.html" />
<modified>2005-03-31T23:18:04Z</modified>
<issued>2005-03-31T21:20:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.62</id>
<created>2005-03-31T21:20:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I was recently asked by a five-year-old who the person on the penny was. I said, &quot;That&apos;s Abraham Lincoln. We like him. He was a good guy.” And I damn near choked up. I thought about that phrase when I...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked by a five-year-old who the person on the penny was. I said, "That's Abraham Lincoln. We like him. He was a good guy.” And I damn near choked up. </p>

<p>I thought about that phrase when I got an email on Tuesday from MoveOn.org asking for money to help Senator Byrd in the 2006 campaign. I sent $50 on the spot. </p>

<p>Today I got this message from MoveOn</p>

<blockquote>But as I write this email, only about two days after our email went out, 19,214 of us have given $817,403.76 to support Senator Byrd. It's a whopping amount in electoral politics--more than MoveOn members have given in support of any other Senator--and at this early stage, it'll make a tremendous impact. This could be a knock-out blow for Republicans who are considering running against the Senator.</blockquote>

<p>It is awfully gratifying to send a little bit of cash and have it turn into $800k. And hopefully when that five-year-old grows up, it won’t seem like so many of the good guys are long gone. <br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Message from God</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/03/message_from_go.html" />
<modified>2005-03-22T07:32:16Z</modified>
<issued>2005-03-22T07:01:08Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.61</id>
<created>2005-03-22T07:01:08Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> Message from God Originally uploaded by daviderwin. This is a rather long caption from a photo I posted to Flickr. The billboard says, &quot;It&apos;s a small world. I know. I made it. -God.&quot; Ugh. Let me count the ways...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daviderwin/7091808/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://photos4.flickr.com/7091808_228faec3a0_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a>
 <br />
 <span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;">
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daviderwin/7091808/">Message from God</a>
  <br />
  Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/daviderwin/">daviderwin</a>.
 </span>
</div>
This is a rather long caption from a photo I posted to Flickr. The billboard says, "It's a small world. I know. I made it. -God."

<p>Ugh. Let me count the ways this is wrong.</p>

<p>1. If God was going to pay $2000/month for a billboard, I’m sure he/she wouldn’t use it to waste my time with a cliché and a bad joke.</p>

<p>2. The design looks like a message from Darth Vader, not God.</p>

<p>3. There is foot mark in “it’s” where an apostrophe belongs. If you’re going to make a design from pure typography - read a book about it!</p>

<p>4. A billboard company is bringing me the wit of God? No. This company has a crew that travels around repairing billboards during thunderstorms and tornados in the middle of the night to get around a law designed to remove these eyesores when they are damaged by natural causes (i.e. God).</p>

<p>5. Was this the best location for a creator to take credit? Here? The grandeur of Airport Blvd. and N. Lamar?</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Shopping for Frames</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/shopping_for_fr_1.html" />
<modified>2005-01-31T01:45:23Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-31T01:36:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.60</id>
<created>2005-01-31T01:36:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"> There are so many choices. There&apos;s the small wide squareish frames with plastic, the small wide squareish frames with metal, small wide squareish with metal and plastic, small wide squareish but a little rounded… Any opinions?...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>

<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daviderwin/3983020/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://photos4.flickr.com/3983020_3d82f16de6_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a>
 

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/daviderwin/3983023/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://photos4.flickr.com/3983023_950aab42a9_m.jpg" width="240" height="240" alt="Shopping for Frames II" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a></p>

</div>
There are so many choices. There's the small wide squareish frames with plastic, the small wide squareish frames with metal, small wide squareish with metal and plastic, small wide squareish but a little rounded…<br />
<br />
Any opinions?
<br clear="all" />]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Errrg.  Common Usability Misunderstanding</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/errrg_common_us.html" />
<modified>2005-01-27T01:13:46Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-26T19:35:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.59</id>
<created>2005-01-26T19:35:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">From an article in Internet Retailer. Most developers of e-catalog technology conduct usability studies to find out what shoppers want from their e-catalogs. However, RichFX’s Creanult says usability is not always as important as what improves sales. “We’re not always...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>From an article in <a href="http://www.internetretailer.com/article.asp?id=13725">Internet Retailer</a>.</p>

<blockquote> Most developers of e-catalog technology conduct usability studies to find out what shoppers want from their e-catalogs. However, RichFX’s Creanult says usability is not always as important as what improves sales. “We’re not always looking for what is most useable to the shopper as much as what sells the most product,” he says. “We’ve found that customers will sometimes say they don’t like certain features, but we often find the features customers say they don’t like actually sell the most product.”</blockquote>

<p><br />
And this from <a href="http://www.uie.com/articles/design_intuitive/">Jared Spool</a></p>

<blockquote>In a recent usability test, I once again witnessed something I’ve seen a hundred times before: a frustrated user claiming he knows exactly what is wrong with the interface he was fighting with. What was his suggestion? “These guys need to make this thing a lot more intuitive. The problem is that this program isn’t intuitive enough. It needs to be more intuitive!”

<p>I think he used the I-Word no less than 25 times during the session. His frustration was real and his desire was great. So, why wasn’t the interface ‘intuitive’? Well, it’s probably because it’s really, really hard to do.</blockquote></p>

<p>This is what I thought when I read the last quote. “‘Why wasn’t the interface intuitive?’ Did you ask him what stuff meant, what things would do and why? Because that’s how you find out.”</p>

<p>When I’m conducting a usability test, my goal is to observe behavior, not listen to opinion, and this is what bugs me about these two quotes. Jared describes something he “witnessed” but he’s talking about an opinion he heard. In the Internet Retailer article, a user’s opinion is treated as a measure of usability, but they’re totally different things.</p>

<p>It’s not that the user’s opinion is irrelevant, it’s just easy to come by and does not require a usability test, and it certainly does not correlate directly to usability. </p>

<p>Here’s a common scenario; a user completes a task quickly with no errors or misunderstandings. This is the fourth one in a row. The user turns to me and says, “I can do this, but other people, they’re going to have trouble. It’s too difficult.” </p>

<p>So what should I write in my notes? “Task too difficult – need to write an essay,” or “Task makes users feel superior to their peers.” </p>

<p>This is what I would jot down, “User completed the task quickly and easily with full understanding. Consider art direction to give a less complex appearance.”</p>

<p>I’ve seen the opposite situation even more. A user goes though a task clearly clueless about the meaning of the interactions or results they would get. I ask them, “What does that mean?” “What does that do?” The answers come back wrong, wrong, wrong. At the end they turn to me and say, “That was great! Really easy and intuitive.”</p>

<p>In that case my notes would read, “Bravo me! Good interface designer! Next!”</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>It&apos;s Music. Music is the Metaphor.</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/a_mouse_is_one.html" />
<modified>2005-01-19T17:04:48Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-19T16:33:31Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.57</id>
<created>2005-01-19T16:33:31Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">A mouse is one finger that can point, and touch. While computers have added orders of magnitude more memory, speed, storage, screen pixels, color, and networking, people are still using one finger. Point. Point. Poke. Poke. Drag. Drop. More specialized...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>A mouse is one finger that can point, and touch. While computers have added orders of magnitude more memory, speed, storage, screen pixels, color, and networking, people are still using one finger. Point. Point. Poke. Poke. Drag. Drop.</p>

<p>More specialized inputs are being invented for video games, but I think musical instruments are the better metaphor for future input devices. Video games are reactive and competitive, and they have a short design history, a few decades, much of it reacting to new technology. Music is collaborative and creative. It is more like work. People have been designing musical instrument interfaces for centuries. Much of that history is a collaboration between craftspeople, musicians and composers. The sophistication of a saxophone or piano interface beats any video game.<br />
	<br />
Anyway, I saw this <a href="http://www.jazzmutant.com/lemur_overview.php">wonderful interface</a> and it got me going. This <a href="http://www.jazzmutant.com/videos/lemur_ball.mpg">video</a> especially.<br />
</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Flickr Fun</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/flickr_fun.html" />
<modified>2005-01-19T05:17:26Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-19T05:11:03Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.56</id>
<created>2005-01-19T05:11:03Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">...and on a lighter note. The chest hair tag on Flickr deals up an unlikely pair....</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>...and on a lighter note. The <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/chesthair/">chest hair</a> tag on Flickr deals up an unlikely pair. </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>No WMD Changes Nothing</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/no_wmd_changes.html" />
<modified>2005-01-19T03:31:49Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-19T03:17:44Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.55</id>
<created>2005-01-19T03:17:44Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Iraq didn’t have WMD. Now it is official and everybody knows. So this seems like as good at time as any to make a point I haven’t heard anyone articulate in the last 3 years. We took a perceived risk...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>Iraq didn’t have WMD. Now it is official and everybody knows. So this seems like as good at time as any to make a point I haven’t heard anyone articulate in the last 3 years. </p>

<p>We took a perceived risk to innocent civilians in the United States and weighed it against the certain death of innocent civilians in Iraq. Then we decided that we preferred the certain death of innocent civilians in Iraq. As it turns out, there were around 100,000 innocent civilians randomly killed. Half of the population of Iraq is under the age of 14. </p>

<p>Preemptive attack is not wrong <em>when</em> it’s a mistake. Preemptive attack is wrong because it <em>might</em> be a mistake. It is always wrong. Morally wrong.</p>

<p>I was raised to believe that Americans are gallant and noble people. And our actions, the sacrifices of my grandparents, during and after WWII were proof. There is nothing gallant or noble about trading the fear of harm to one person for the certain death and injury of another.</p>

<p>In writing this I thought to look up a letter that I sent in 2003. I haven’t changed my mind since then. </p>

<blockquote>March 16, 2003

<p>President Bush,</p>

<p>I am writing to express my opposition to waging war against Iraq. </p>

<p>I base my opposition on these facts.</p>

<p>1.	Iraq has not attacked the United States.<br />
2.	Iraq has not attacked any other nation.<br />
3.	An attack on Iraq would kill people.</p>

<p>I have heard these reasons for war</p>

<p>1.	Iraq might attack the U.S.A. or another nation.<br />
2.	We are tired of waiting for Iraq to comply with UN resolutions.</p>

<p>Fear cannot justify war. Impatience cannot justify war. I believe war is only justified to stop direct, actual, violent, military attack on a nation or a people. This is simply not happening.</p>

<p>I believe that an attack on Iraq will spoil our relations with people and nations around the world for generations. I do not believe that this war will make the world safer for Americans or anyone else. </blockquote></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Infoporn</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/infoporn.html" />
<modified>2005-01-14T07:29:54Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-14T06:19:21Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.54</id>
<created>2005-01-14T06:19:21Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">There it is again, that term “infoporn.” I thought Mystic River was “acting porn”. That meant that the story, (or more generically, “the most important thing”) was only present to justify something more base. In this case, lots of crying,...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Diagrams</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>There it is again, that term “<a href="http://www.nixlog.com/apple/">infoporn</a>.” </p>

<p>I thought <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0327056/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnxteD0yMHxzZz0xfGxtPTIwMHx0dD1vbnxwbj0wfHE9bXlzdGljIHJpdmVyfGh0bWw9MXxubT1vbg__;fc=1;ft=7;fm=1">Mystic River</a> was “acting porn”. That meant that the story, (or more generically, “the most important thing”) was only present to justify something more base. In this case, lots of crying, yelling, sweating and otherwise gratuitous intense acting.</p>

<p>I guess “infoporn” is supposed to be ironic. I hope that it’s ironic because the information (the most important thing) stands out to the exclusion something more base (<a href="https://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000wN&topic_id=1">chart junk</a>), and therefore great information design is the exact opposite of pornography. But I suspect that the more common interpretation of the irony is that charts and graphs are not sexy and porn is not smart, so the opposite of charts and graphs is porn. Viola, irony!</p>

<p>More irony below. </p>

<p><img alt="infoporn.jpg" src="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/infoporn.jpg" width="480" height="964" /></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>iPod Drip</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/ipod_1.html" />
<modified>2005-01-12T17:45:49Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-12T16:31:34Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.53</id>
<created>2005-01-12T16:31:34Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I find this photo for the new iPod curious. The Black/White/Color ads were all about movement and activity, but this one is kind of mopey. And in that context, the white plastic design stops being fresh and new, and becomes...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Life</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p><img align="right" alt="newipod.jpg" src="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/newipod.jpg" width="124" height="200" />I find this photo for the new iPod curious. The Black/White/Color ads were all about movement and activity, but this one is kind of mopey. And in that context, the white plastic design stops being fresh and new, and becomes downright medical. Like one of those self-regulated morphine drips that are issued after outpatient surgery. I half expect the white tubes to lead into his nose or arm.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br></p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Go ahead, cut and paste</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/go_ahead_cut_an.html" />
<modified>2005-01-12T06:18:49Z</modified>
<issued>2005-01-12T06:06:43Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.io.com,2005:/~dme/blog//1.52</id>
<created>2005-01-12T06:06:43Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I&apos;m really really sure Josh Marshall does not read my blog. So it was funny to see a post tonight that was so close to the letter I sent to my Senators. I said : &quot;I am 35 years old...</summary>
<author>
<name>dme</name>

<email>dme@io.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/">
<![CDATA[<p>I'm really really sure <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/">Josh Marshall</a> does not read my blog. So it was funny to see a <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_01_09.php#004393">post</a> tonight that was so close to the <a href="http://www.io.com/~dme/blog/archives/2005/01/letters_to_my_s_1.html">letter</a> I sent to my Senators.</p>

<p>I said : "I am 35 years old .... I can expect to get full benefits until I am 83 years old. After that, with no changes, the system is projected to cover 80% of my promised benefits."</p>

<p>Josh said: "I'm thirty-five .... I'll have no problem until 2052, when I'll be 83. After that, they say, there will be a reduction, but again not an overwhelming one."</p>

<p>Maybe I'll get a chance to hang out with him at the old folks home. And if he helps save Social Security, the first round of Ensure is on me.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>