Return to Master Table of Contents
As of 2/13/03, remains from all seven Astronauts onboard Columbia have been positively identified. Per NASA officials, remains including seven positively identified torsos were all recovered within a 12-mile radius in Sabine County, TX. Following further analysis on the remains, private memorial services for the crew were held over the weeks following the loss of Columbia. As of 3/12/03, the crew has all been laid to rest as follows:
- Commander Rick Husband was buried at Llano Cemetery in Amarillo on 2/21/03.
- Pilot Willie McCool was buried at his home in Washington state following services at Annapolis on 2/27/03.
- Mission Specialist David Brown was buried in Arlington National Cemetery on 3/12/03.
- Payload Commander Michael Anderson was buried at Arlington National Cemetery on 3/07/03.
- Mission Specialist Laurel Clark was buried at Arlington National Cemetery on 3/10/03.
- Mission Specialist Kalpana Chawla remains were reportedly cremated at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware and her ashes were scattered across a as-yet unspecified national park in Utah. Date of cremation and dispersal of ashes have not been released by the family, but are believed to have occurred after 2/15/03.
- Payload Specialist Ilan Ramon, an Israeli Air Force colonel who was Israel's first astronaut, was the first one laid to rest. He was buried on 2/11/03 in a private ceremony at Nahalal, a farming community in northern Israel, in accordance with the requirements of his faith. His final resting place overlooks the Israeli airbase where Ramon, an air force colonel, used to be stationed. On 3/05/03, a shloshim memorial was held to mark the end of the traditional 30-day Jewish period of mourning.
The remains, recovered during recent searches for shuttle debris, had been taken to the National Mortuary at Dover Air Force Base to be identified. Dover Air Force Base is the same facility the bodies of the Challenger Astronauts were taken in 1986. The base's Charles C. Carson Center for Mortuary Affairs is the only such military facility in the continental United States that has the capabilities of identifying remains and examining them for potentially harmful objects such as sharp pieces of metal, toxic hypergolic fuels, or even imbedded explosive bolts that could harm medical workers.
Despite NASA's closure to the search for the crew's remains, an earlier additional caveat needs to be restressed at this time: the vast majority of Americans living in the region are not forensic experts, and it should not come as a surprise if any new report of remains being found turn out to be desiccated dead animals, AKA "roadkill", or even remains from sources not related to the loss of Columbia. In fact, Texas law enforcement authorities reported on 2/12/03 that in addition to the burning deer carcass previously reported, some of the remains found turned out to be "a prized hunting dog", and a shallow grave containing portions of two significantly older corpses.
Return to Master Table of Contents
On 4/16/03, President George W. Bush signed the "Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003" into law. This included the "Columbia Orbiter Memorial Act" is contained in what is now Public Law Number 108-11. The Columbia Orbiter Memorial Act, was introduced into the legislation in March 2003 in the US Senate by Ted Stevens (R-AL), and in the US House of Representatives by C.W. Bill Young (R-FL).
The law authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in consultation the NASA, to place the Columbia marker in Arlington National Cemetery, and authorizes up to $500,000 of previously appropriated funds for the memorial. The legislation also authorizes NASA to collect gifts and donations, over the next five years, for the Columbia Memorial. It also permits NASA to erect other appropriate memorials or monuments with private donations. The law allows NASA to transfer collected money or property for the fund to the Secretary of the Army to defray expenses. Memorial fund procedures will be established and announced in the near future.
At the time of this writing, plans call for the memorial to be placed in the Arlington National Cemetery near the memorial to the crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger.
Return to Master Table of Contents
NASA continues to encourage citizens to report finding any materials suspected to be materials from the Columbia accident. To better facilitate in the public's efforts to aid in the recovery, NASA has established a telephone hotline and electronic mail address for the public to use for reporting information that may help investigators studying today's Space Shuttle mishap.
Anyone who discovers debris from the accident or who has film or video evidence that may be of value to the investigation team is urged to use these contacts. Please avoid contact with any debris, because it may be hazardous as a result of toxic propellants aboard the Shuttle.
Telephone reports should be directed to the following numbers:1-866-446-6603
(281) 483-3388
Text reports should be e-mailed to:
Images should be e-mailed to:
Citizens are reminded Shuttle materials may not look like typical aircraft components. Pictures of examples of Shuttle debris may be viewed at the following website:
NASA also reminds all citizens that any debris found is US Government property and is critical to the investigation of the mishap. All debris from the accident should be left in place and reported to Government authorities. Unauthorized persons found in possession of accident debris will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. See the next section below in this FAQ for more information on how serious this is.
Return to Master Table of Contents
Those who think they've suddenly got a new house coming from a quick sale of Columbia debris on eBay should be aware of the following: All debris is United States Government property and is critical to the investigation of the shuttle accident. Any and all debris from the accident is to be left alone and reported to government authorities. Unauthorized persons found in possession of accident debris will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Just to clarify things, under the current definition of the law, it is a federal offense to knowingly and without authority remove, conceal or withhold a part of the civil craft involved in an accident or property on the craft at the time of the accident. A conviction is punishable by imprisonment up to 10 years and a $250,000 fine. This means that handling, touching, collecting, keeping, selling, trading, or otherwise not reporting debris found are all considered "unauthorized use of debris" by NASA's Office of the Inspector General, and should be reported using their Internet hotline:
Note also that any sort of improper debris handling can be reported using any of the contact methods listed for reporting debris finds.
As of this writing, outside of a few tasteless lots on Columbia memorabilia and a few bad joke auctions, nobody's come forth with Columbia debris for sale. To its credit, eBay has been very vigilant in policing its auctions for any scams or actual attempts to sell Columbia debris
On a side note, there's this misconception that something like Shuttle wreckage falls from the sky and you find it on your property you get to claim it. The truth is that yes, salvage law applies, but no, you don't get to claim any such debris because according to that same law it belongs to its original owner. In this case, it's NASA. The disaster is not a change of title or ownership in any way, shape or form.
Note that this applies to all spacecraft. Case in point: when Curt Newport & his team recovered Liberty Bell 7 from the ocean floor in 1998, contracts were in place with the US Government that secured permission to perform the recovery. Without the contracts, Newport & company could have been arrested for stealing government property. This isn't unique to spacecraft, mind you. The same law that applies to sunken ships, cars deposited in rivers and lakes by flash floods, and stone chips off of Mount Rushmore.
Return to Master Table of Contents
Contrary to some crackpots, trolls and wannabee eBay scammers, handling the Columbia debris could very well be as suicidal as bailing out at ~200,000ft (~60,000 m) in the middle of a 3000° F (1650° C) plasma stream.
There are four hazardous compounds that are in standard use onboard the Shuttles: raw hydrazine, monomethyl hydrazine, nitrogen tetroxide and pure ammonia.
- Raw hydrazine fueled the shuttle's auxiliary power units, which generated hydraulic pressure for various functions in the shuttle.
- Monomethyl hydrazine is part of the hypergolic fuel for the Shuttle's Reaction Control Systems (RCS) while it was in space.
- Nitrogen tetroxide the other half of the RCS hypergolic fuel supply.
- Pure ammonia is used as a coolant to remove heat from the electrical systems on the orbiter engines.
Each of these chemicals have their own reactive and hazard characteristics:
- Nitrogen tetroxide and monomethyl hydrazine are "hypergolic" propellants, meaning they ignite spontaneously when they come in contact with each other, a useful property for maneuvering systems.
- Both Raw hydrazine and monomethyl hydrazine are clear, flammable liquids which will irritate the eyes, skin and respiratory system and cause vomiting, diarrhea, tremors, convulsions and permanent damage to internal organs. Both are considered "immediately dangerous to life" at a concentration of 50 parts per million. Note that neither are not considered to have warning signs of contact but can be detected in the blood of an exposed person.
- It should be noted for safety's sake that raw hydrazine and monomethyl hydrazine are not considered to have sufficient warning signs, especially for chronic exposure. But acutely, the smell detection limit is around 3 or 4 ppm. Both are very dangerous by skin contact as well, though, so it's not worth taking any chances.
Their smell is similar to ammonia, but more "fishy". These have a much better chance of being still present in debris than ammonia or nitrogen tetroxide, just based on boiling points.
- Contrary to news reports, pure ammonia is not a clear liquid at normal temperatures. It's a gas at room temperature and pressure, with a boiling point of about -33°s C. Unless it's still in a sealed system, it's gone from any Columbia debris by now. Of course, if it's still in a sealed system, it's under a fair amount of pressure and thus potentially quite dangerous.
- Nitrogen tetroxide is a reddish-brown gas at room temperature and has a "pungent, sweetish" smell, according to experts. It can injure the eyes and skin on contact, and, if inhaled, can damage the lungs. A single exposure can prove fatal, but only high concentrations produce immediate symptoms. Warning signs of contact might not appear for hours after exposure, and extreme symptoms might not show up for days, so a victim might be unaware he or she has been exposed until it is too late for treatment.
Even small residues of these chemicals can pose a safety hazard to humans, and inhaling even small amounts of fumes from either chemical would be extremely unhealthy. Most certainly much of these chemicals remained intact all the way to the ground. There is one shot that has been shown on the TV news networks which I believe is probably a large quantity of hydrazine burning on the ground. There are also other materials in the Shuttle which can pose a safety hazard to people if they come in close contact with them, such as batteries, electronics components, tiles, etc.
Due to the hazardous nature of these chemicals, people who suspect contact with any of these chemicals are urged to seek immediate medical treatment from a hospital or doctor. Those especially suspecting contact with nitrogen tetroxide should flush their body and clothes with large amounts of water immediately, and, if possible, remove their clothing and bathe with soap and water at least 15 minutes. Eyes should be held open and flushed with water for at least as long, and immediate medical treatment should be sought.
In addition to the chemical hazards, there's the issue of the silica fibers that are one of the main components of the Shuttle tiles. Silica can be deadlier than asbestos, actually, with a proven track record of killing asbestos workers over lengthy periods of exposure. Death is not from cancer, from the silica fibers virtually petrifying their lungs. The term for such a condition "silicosis", and OSHA has an page on their website that explains the condition in more detail:One additional hazard to the debris should not be overlooked: In many areas of the Shuttle, explosive bolts and other pyrotechnical devices were installed that may have survived re-entry and despite requiring an initiator to detonate under normal circumstances, could still be active. These pyro devices can cause severe injury if they detonate while being physically handled, and are yet another reason any suspected debris from Columbia should be granted a safe distance and allowed to be examined and collected only by trained hazmat personnel.
Most of these were pyro devices were installed around the port side airlock, and were used to blow the hatch open and away in the event of an emergency. According to NASA sources, there are 300 initiators flown on each shuttle flight to start the various pyrotechnic device. 1/3 are used per flight for SRB separation, ET separation, launch pad functions, landing gear, drag chute, etc. The remaining 2/3 include crew escape functions, crew personal pyros (parachute disconnects, flares, smokes, etc.), and contingency capabilities.
Finally, there's the issue of jagged metal, which can be razor sharp and pierce and/or cut the skin. And if the metal's contaminated with any of the abovementioned chemicals, this will allow them into the bloodstream a lot quicker and thus increase the health risks.Bottom line: NASA isn't joking about how hazardous this stuff is. If you really do come across debris from Columbia, keep your distance, immediately contact your local authorities to come rope the area off, and contact NASA at the number listed in the previous section.
Return to Master Table of Contents
Believe it or not, this was an actual question submitted to the FAQ Compiler for serious consideration. Luckily, NASA already has an answer.
Any individual suffering from an injury or damaged property caused by debris from the Space Shuttle Columbia can seek possible compensation from NASA. Those needing to make claims should file them with one of three agency offices. Injury and damage claims should be sent to the closest of the following NASA facilities to you:Office of the Chief Counsel
NASA Johnson Space Center
Mail Code: AL 2101 NASA Road 1
Houston, TX 77058
(281) 483-3021
Office of the General Counsel
NASA Headquarters
Mail Code: G 300 E St., SW
Washington, DC 20546
(202) 358-2450
Office of Chief Counsel
NASA Stennis Space Center
Mail Code: CA00 Building 1100
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
(228) 688-2164Per NASA's Office of General Counsel, claims can be made by filling out the Standard 95 form available at the US Department of Justice website:
NASA will also provide the forms upon request.
Return to Master Table of Contents
Actually, they do. That phase of reentry isn't normally tracked visually, and so far only amateur photography and videotape, and a couple of professional news shots, provide any visual record of the breakup. NASA has put out an official request for anyone having any digital imagery of the mishap to relay it to them ASAP. The actual instructions for doing so are reposted here to assist the efforts.
From http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/COL_upload.html:
Instructions for Uploading Digital Evidence to NASAFor anyone who has recorded video or taken photos that they believe may be of aid in the investigation of the Space Shuttle Columbia accident, NASA has established a special location on the Web where Internet users may upload their media files to be reviewed by NASA.
Using the FTP method of your choice, log on to the server 38.201.67.72 as "anonymous," using your e-mail address as your password.
Example:
User ID: anonymous
Password: john_doe@hotmail.comAlong with any image or video file that you wish to upload, please include a text file containing your name and a detailed description of the time and location at which the image or video was taken. Example: I, John Doe, recorded this video in my front yard at 1111 My Street in Nacogdoches, Texas, at 7:55 a.m. on the morning of Saturday, Feb. 1, 2003. Please be sure that your media file and your text file conform to the following naming convention: your first and last name, an underscore, the date the files are being uploaded, another underscore and the time the files are being uploaded. Other than the file extension (.jpg, .txt, .rm), the names of the two files you upload should be the same.
Examples:
Image file: johndoe_020203_0415pm.jpg
Video file: johndoe_020203_0415pm.rm
Text file: johndoe_020203_0415pm.txtThen, upload your media and text files.
Please note that files contained on this site are not listable. Therefore, users will not be able to view any files uploaded to the server, including their own.
If you have any problems uploading your files, please e-mail Mike Koester of the Johnson Space Center.
Return to Master Table of Contents
For those just tuning in, on 2/7/03, AvLeak reported that high-resolution images taken from what has since been confirmed as being the Starfire Observatory, a special ground-based Air Force tracking camera facility in the Southwestern US, showed serious structural damage to the inboard leading edge of Columbia's left wing, as the crippled orbiter flew overhead about 60 seconds before the vehicle broke up over Texas on 2/1/03. One of the images from a reported "minute's worth of film" was displayed during the NASA Accident Review Briefing the same day. The image shows what appears to be a jagged edge on the left inboard wing structure near where the wing begins to intersect the fuselage. The image also appears to show the orbiter's right aft yaw thrusters firing, apparently trying to correct the vehicle's attitude that was being adversely affected by the left wing damage. In addition, the image shows what most likely is debris streaming off the trailing edge of Columbia's left wing. By Comparison, the fuselage and right wing in the image appear normal.
The actual AvLeak article can be found here:http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/shuttle2_news.xml
During the Shuttle Accident Review Briefing on 2/7/03, in a very fast move on his part, sci.space.history regular "LooseChanj" captured the image off of NASA TV, which allowed the image to be circulated across the Internet before the news services were able to perform the same service. Shortly after, the first attempts at visual enhancements were performed and made available on OMWorld:
- Raw image from TV Capture Card:
- Image with Color Data discarded & Contrast Enhancement:
- Image with Color Data discarded, Contrast Enhanced, and Black/White Inverted:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/images/IR_contrast_enhance_mono_in.jpg
- Same as Previous, with Annotations:
One caveat on these images: the "stars" you see are actually artifacts from TV interference that most capture cards experience, and some of the "blockyness" may also be due to the same.
Later that same evening, NASA made available a cleaner official copy of the Air Force image. A revised set of enhancements were made and posted on OMWorld:
- Raw Image
- Contrast Enhanced with Black & White Inverted
- Same as above, with Annotations
In addition, a comparison between the USAF infrared image and one of Columbia on approach from a similar angle at the end of STS-2 was posted on OMWorld:
NASA also made available a series of diagrams on slides showing the current understanding of the chain of sensor failures on the Left Wing.
From the STS-107 Investigation Reference Page:http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle/investigation/sensors/index.html
Since these slides were released, several composite images were made available by regulars on the sci.space groups:
Rolf Karlstad overlaid the Shuttle Sensor Wiring Diagram over a rotated & perspective-adjusted version of the Starfire Observatory photo:James Lerch took a 3D image of the Shuttle and constructed a animation of the Starfire Observatory photo on top of the 3-D image fading back and forth between the two.
http://lerch.no-ip.com/atm/Shuttle_sm.gif (168KB animated .gif)
http://lerch.no-ip.com/atm/Shuttle.gif (542KB larger .gif)Note that the 3-D image of the Shuttle shows the gear deployed. This was done only to provide a point of reference for those viewing the image, and does not imply that the gear were deployed during this phase of the landing.
On a side note, the Shuttle in James' animation was generated by "Orbiter", a 3-D orbital flight simulator by Martin Schweiger, and can be found at:
Return to Master Table of Contents
According to Orthodox Jewish burial customs, the mourning period begins with the funeral. It is tradition for the burial to take place as soon as possible, even on the same day of the death, but no more than two nights after the death. Only under certain circumstances, the burial can be delayed. It is considered disrespectful to keep the body from being buried as soon as possible. Otherwise, the deceased's soul may have returned to God, but his body is left to linger in the land of the living. This is considered a matter of great shame.
Return to Master Table of Contents
All payloads performed well during the 16-day mission. NASA's Office of Biological and Physical Research (OBPR) science project teams report the overall performance of the experimental hardware and equipment employed on the mission was highly successful, with 100 percent operational success being achieved for virtually all of the experiments.
However, for the following group of four biology and protein crystallization research instruments, no scientific results will be available as no samples or electronic data can be provided to the Investigators for analysis:
- Advanced Protein Crystallization Facility (APCF): included 38 experiment containers. Data were recorded on a digital tape and the scientific results consisted of the processed experiment samples.
- Biobox was related to four experiments. The results of Biobox consisted of processed experiment samples. Only facility telemetry data are actually available which indicate a perfect performance of Biobox.
- Biopack was related to eight experiments. Scientific results of Biopack consisted of processed experiments samples.
- European Research in Space and Terrestrial Osteoporosis (ERISTO) was related to two experiments with 12 experiment samples consisting of human bone cells. ERISTO made use of the OSTEO on loan from the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). Again, the science results were represented by the samples themselves.
For the following experiments, most of which involved the physical science disciplines of combustion research, material sciences, and fluid physics, anywhere between 50-90 percent of the data was acquired:
- The Mechanics of Granular Materials (MGM) investigators estimate that careful analysis of the downlinked data should result in achieving 50 to 60% of their science goals. The MGM experiment used the microgravity of orbit to test sand columns under conditions that cannot be obtained from experiments on Earth. The knowledge gained from this will be applied to improving foundations for buildings and increasing understanding of how earthquakes and other forces disturb grains of soil and sand.
Stein Sture, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said he got up to 70 percent of data needed for his experiment, which tested sand columns to study the mechanics of granular materials. The new knowledge will improve foundations for buildings and the handling of powdered materials in chemical, agricultural and other industries.
"We should have most of the data to really make some good conclusions. We're very glad we had this opportunity and will be forever thankful to the Astronauts that they were able to do these experiments in the excellent way they did," he said. "Our thoughts go out to the Astronauts and their families. That is certainly the first thing on the minds of scientists."
- Almost all of the data from Critical Viscosity of Xenon, an experiment sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was acquired before the end of the mission. This experiment measured the changes in viscosity (resistance to flow) of xenon, a pure fluid with a very simple structure and a critical temperature just below room temperature. The data may help scientists better understand shear thinning in complex fluids such as paints and foods (e.g., whipped cream), which need to flow easily during application and stand firm afterwards.
- STARNAV, a star tracker navigation system from Texas A&M University accomplished all of its objectives. This educational experiment was designed to validate a new algorithm for determining precise spacecraft attitude without prior knowledge of position. According to John Junkins, a professor of aerospace engineering at Texas A&M and head of the STARNAV project, "If I had gotten nothing out of it, I would say my losses are minimal, compared with the loss of life. I was just fortuitous [the experiment] had the opportunity to ride on the shuttle."
- SPACEHAB's Space Media commercial payload, STARS, saw many amazing results on this mission. As part of an education program with experiments designed by students, the STARS payload (www.starsprogram.com) received daily downlink of video, photos, humidity and temperature readings. Students from Australia, China, Israel, Japan, Liechtenstein, and the United States designed these six experiments. They were able to achieve approximately 70 percent of their scientific objectives, providing unique insight into the low gravity impact on the behavior and development of ants, bees, silkworms, and fish eggs, the random crystal growth of cobalt and calcium, and the web spinning ability of spiders.
The ant experiment was part of six student investigations aboard Columbia that studied how such creatures as spiders and silkworms behave in space. The ants, for example, tunnel much faster in space. The students involved in designing the ant experiment intend to complete their research based on the data that was returned prior to Columbia's breakup.
"Their intent is to finish the experiment as a tribute to the Astronauts, as a way to show respect to them," said Charlotte Archibald, a chemistry teacher who supervised four students from Fowler High School in Syracuse, New York, who were involved in an experiment that looked at whether ants tunnel more slowly in microgravity.
- The Solar Constant Experiment (SOLCON), managed by the Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium and sponsored by NASA, was designed to measure the solar constant and identify variations in the value during a solar cycle. This experiment was a 100 percent success. The data will ensure continuity of the solar constant level obtained by instruments mounted on free flyers, over climate time scale duration.
- The Low Power Transceiver (LPT) experiments were completed and 100 percent of the data collected. These experiments demonstrated LPT's ability to do simultaneous communications and on-board navigation in space. The data from this experiment may provide more cost-effective space operations in future satellites
- The Mediterranean Israeli Dust Experiment (MEIDEX) acquired an image of a pall of gray smoke hanging above the Amazon rainforest illustrating how complex interactions between smoke and the atmosphere can influence weather and climate. This experiment was one of Ilan Ramon's main tasks during Columbia's final mission.
- The Combustion Module-2 Experiment package - which studied how spherical flames, extremely lean fuel-air mixtures near the lower limits of combustion, burn in space - is expected to produce a near-100% completion as there was enough information, including video and photographs, downlinked during Columbia's mission to allow results to be analyzed completely. According to project director Paul Ronney, he takes some comfort in knowing the hard work as well as enjoyment they put into his project yielded enough data for its completion.
- Ronney, who's studied the mysterious, low-combustion spherical flames since discovering them in 1984, said it will take him at least a year to analyze the data from his experiment. "In some cases I will have to do some detective work and make some judgments because we don't have a complete record," he said. "I will make the most inferences I can without being totally speculative. I have more of a responsibility to squeeze as much scientific data as I can from these results, which is what they would have wanted."
The lack of gravity allows the flames to burn longer than they could on Earth, and the experiments produced the weakest flames ever burned in space or on Earth and the longest burning flame in space to date. Ronney believes the results could one day lead to better combustion engines with higher fuel efficiency and fewer pollutants.For the following group of three research instruments all resulting data from experiments were received well prior to the loss of Columbia, and will be available for further scientific analysis:
- Com2Plex was related to three technological experiments exploring new Loop Heat Pipe designs proposed by Industry. Telemetry data of all experiments indicated already significant improvements of heat transfer capabilities. More detailed analyses of the data will be performed in the future.
- Facility for Adsorption and Surface Tension (FAST) concluded all three experiments during the flight. All information (telemetry and video data) is available for further analysis by three investigator groups.
- Advanced Respiratory Monitoring System (ARMS) was related to 7 flight experiments and 1 ground experiment in pulmonary and cardio-vascular research in microgravity. All pre-flight Baseline Data Collection (BDC) information and all flight data are available in electronic form for further analysis by the Investigators.
The final results from these and other experiments will be determined in the coming months as the acquired data are analyzed. More information about the research performed by the Columbia crew is available on the Internet at: